Epistemic entrenchment-based multiple contractions

In this article we present a new class of multiple contraction functions—the epistemic entrenchment-based multiple contractions—which are a generalization of the epistemic entrenchment-based contractions (Gardenfors, 1988; G ¨ ardenfors & Makinson, 1988) to the case of ¨ contractions by (possibly nonsingleton) sets of sentences and provide an axiomatic characterization for that class of functions. Moreover, we show that the class of epistemic entrenchment-based multi ple contractions coincides with the class of system of spheres-based multiple contractions introduced in Ferme & Reis (2012).info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

System of spheres-based multiple contractions

We propose a new class of multiple contraction operations — the system of spheres-based multiple contractions — which are a generalization of Grove’s system of spheres-based (singleton) contractions to the case of contractions by (possibly non-singleton) sets of sentences. Furthermore, we show that this new class of functions is a subclass of the class of the partial meet multiple contractions.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Possible worlds semantics for partial meet multiple contraction

In the logic of theory change, the standard model is AGM, proposed by Alchourrón et al. (J Symb Log 50:510–530, 1985). This paper focuses on the extension of AGM that accounts for contractions of a theory by a set of sentences instead of only by a single sentence. Hansson (Theoria 55:114–132, 1989), Fuhrmann and Hansson (J Logic Lang Inf 3:39–74, 1994) generalized Partial Meet Contraction to the case of contractions by (possibly non-singleton) sets of sentences. In this paper we present the possible worlds semantics for partial meet multiple contractions.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Residual contraction

In this paper, we propose and axiomatically characterize residual contractions, a new kind of contraction operators for belief bases. We establish that the class of partial meet contractions is a strict subclass of the class of residual contractions. We identify an extra condition that may be added to the definition of residual contractions, which is such that the class of residual contractions that satisfy it coincides with the class of partial meet contrac tions. We investigate the interrelations in the sense of (strict) inclusion among the class of residual contractions and other classes of well known contraction operators for belief bases.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

System of Spheres-based Two Level Credibility-limited Revisions

Two level credibility-limited revision is a non-prioritized revision operation. When revising by a two level credibility-limited revision, two levels of credibility and one level of incredibility are considered. When revising by a sentence at the highest level of credibility, the operator behaves as a standard revision, if the sentence is at the second level of credibility, then the outcome of the revision process coincides with a standard contraction by the negation of that sentence. If the sentence is not credible, then the original belief set remains unchanged. In this paper, we propose a construction for two level credibility-limited revision operators based on Grove's systems of spheres and present an axiomatic characterization for these operators.Comment: In Proceedings TARK 2023, arXiv:2307.0400

Two axiomatic characterizations for the system of spheres-based (and the Epistemic Entrenchment-based) multiple contractions

t In some recent works (Reis 2011, Ferme and Reis, J. Philos. Log. ´ 41, 29–52, 2012, Ferme and Reis, Rev. Symb. Log. ´ 6, 460–487, 2013) two new kinds of multiple contraction functions have been proposed, namely the system of spheres-based multiple contractions and the epistemic entrenchment-based multiple contractions, as generalizations (to the case of multiple contraction) of the well-known classes of systems of spheres-based and of epistemic entrenchment-based (singleton) contractions. Additionally, a representa tion theorem for the class of epistemic entrenchment-based multiple contraction has been proposed, and it has been shown that the two newly proposed constructions are equivalent, in the sense that a multiple contraction function is a system of spheres-based multiple contrac tion if and only if it is an epistemic entrenchment-based multiple contraction. In this paper we present two axiomatic characterizations for those multiple contraction functions which differ from the one mentioned above and, in particular, make use of some more intuitive postulates.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Levi and Harper identities for non-prioritized belief base change

In this paper, we investigate the relation between shielded base contraction postulates and credibility-limited (CL) base revision postulates. More precisely, we identify (i) the relation between the postulates satisfied by a shielded base contraction operator and the postulates satisfied by the CL base revision operator that is defined from it by means of the consistency-preserving Levi identity and (ii) the relation between the postulates satisfied by a CL base revision operator and the postulates satisfied by the shielded base contraction operator that is defined from it by means of the Harper identity. Furthermore, we show that the consistency-preserving Levi identity and the Harper identity establish a one-to one correspondence between the twenty classes of shielded base contractions presented in [21] and the twenty classes of credibility-limited base revisions presented in [22].info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Shielded base contraction

The one that is considered the standard model in the area of logic of belief change was proposed by Alchourrón, Gärdenfors and Makinson in 1985 and is, nowadays, known as the AGM model. Two of the main shortcomings pointed out to the AGM model of belief change are the (impractical) use of belief sets to represent belief states and the (unrealistic) acceptance of any new information. In this paper we study a kind of operators—known as shielded base contractions—which address both those issues. Indeed, on the one hand, these operators are defined on belief bases (rather than belief sets) and, on the other hand, they are constructed with the underlying idea that not all new informations are accepted. We propose twenty different classes of shielded base contractions and obtain axiomatic characterizations for each of them. Additionally we thoroughly investigate the interrelations (in the sense of inclusion) among all those classes. More precisely, we analyse whether each of those classes is or is not (strictly) contained in each of the remaining ones.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Studies in credibility: limited base revision

In this paper we present axiomatic characterizations for several classes of credibility-limited base revision functions and establish the interrelation among those classes. We also propose and axiomatically characterize two new base revision functions.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio